Re: Future Non-server Windows support???
От | Bill Haught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Future Non-server Windows support??? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 281bc6d4-b96a-fe1a-cdcb-49e5fe242576@att.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Future Non-server Windows support??? (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Future Non-server Windows support???
Re: Future Non-server Windows support??? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/7/2019 8:29 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: > Bill Haught schrieb am 07.03.2019 um 20:41: >> "...most Windows 95 applications still run fine in Windows 10 - >> that's 20 years of binary compatibility" See Major Linux Problems on >> the Desktop, 2018 edition by Artem S. Tashkinov >> https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html >> >> >> I really wish Linux or Linux plus Darling was a real alternative to >> Winblows. > > On the server, Linux definitely *is* a real alternative to Windows > > > My 0.02€ > > Thomas > > > > In the case of servers, I thought it was the other way around. Last I heard they were neck-and-neck after Linux being overwhelmingly in the lead for at least something like the first decade of the (at least "public") Internet. Like why would anyone choose Winbloz *if* you don't *have* too, I have no idea.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: