Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ee912759-e14b-d690-cab3-1c4e0183c313@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/30/16 1:18 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > We talked about this issue, when I wrote function pg_size_bytes. It is > hard to fix these functions after years of usage. The new set of > functions can be better > > pg_iso_size_pretty(); > pg_iso_size_bytes(); One thing that would actually be nice for other reasons as well is a version of pg_size_pretty() that lets you specify the output unit, say, as a second argument. Because sometimes you want to compare two tables or something, and tells you one is 3GB and the other is 783MB, which doesn't really help. If I tell it to use 'MB' as the output unit, I could get comparable output. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: