Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRB-AUqz=LTxmNneeEPP1N_8MX1S3ge+MyVY5bUPr2nBQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-08-01 20:51 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 7/30/16 1:18 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> We talked about this issue, when I wrote function pg_size_bytes. It is
> hard to fix these functions after years of usage. The new set of
> functions can be better
>
> pg_iso_size_pretty();
> pg_iso_size_bytes();
One thing that would actually be nice for other reasons as well is a
version of pg_size_pretty() that lets you specify the output unit, say,
as a second argument. Because sometimes you want to compare two tables
or something, and tells you one is 3GB and the other is 783MB, which
doesn't really help. If I tell it to use 'MB' as the output unit, I
could get comparable output.
It is looks like some convert function
pg_size_to(size, unit, [others ... rounding, truncating]) returns numeric
select pg_size_to(1024*1024, 'KB')
Regards
Pavel
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: