Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types
От | Asko Oja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ecd779860808171107r2ffbbab9h9284abe2e1ce08cf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types ("Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I can say that we have had several times to use bigint instead because of the lack of uint type in postgres.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> wrote:I am glad it is useful. I needed it for my current project, and I was hoping others could use it as well.On Aug 15, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Ryan Bradetich wrote:Is the intention for the types to go into pg_catalog? It'd be nice if you could specify what schema they should be installed in. An uninstall would also be good.Here is the first pass at the unsigned data type I have been working on.
I am planning on adding these to the September 2008 commitfest wiki page.
The unsigned data type is not targeted for core, but for the uint PgFoundry project.
The pg_catalog made since to me at first (especially for my application), but on reflection I believe you are right. I will remove the references to the pg_catalog schema and allow the user to add the unsigned data type to any schema. Good catch on the uninstall script. I should have written this as well. I will post an update to the wiki later tonight.
Thanks for doing this, I've wished we had uint types in the past, and I'm sure I will again in the future!
Thanks,
- Ryan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: