Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types
| От | Ryan Bradetich |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e739902b0808171103k3bff1243wd31aca4f5569fd3e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> wrote:
The pg_catalog made since to me at first (especially for my application), but on reflection I believe you are right. I will remove the references to the pg_catalog schema and allow the user to add the unsigned data type to any schema. Good catch on the uninstall script. I should have written this as well. I will post an update to the wiki later tonight.
I am glad it is useful. I needed it for my current project, and I was hoping others could use it as well.
Thanks,
- Ryan
On Aug 15, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Ryan Bradetich wrote:Is the intention for the types to go into pg_catalog? It'd be nice if you could specify what schema they should be installed in. An uninstall would also be good.Here is the first pass at the unsigned data type I have been working on.
I am planning on adding these to the September 2008 commitfest wiki page.
The unsigned data type is not targeted for core, but for the uint PgFoundry project.
The pg_catalog made since to me at first (especially for my application), but on reflection I believe you are right. I will remove the references to the pg_catalog schema and allow the user to add the unsigned data type to any schema. Good catch on the uninstall script. I should have written this as well. I will post an update to the wiki later tonight.
Thanks for doing this, I've wished we had uint types in the past, and I'm sure I will again in the future!
Thanks,
- Ryan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: