Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
От | Jan de Visser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ea4f3ac1-df98-247d-2666-eaba35f58d55@de-visser.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0
in catalog head files?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-11-09 10:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Hmm, that's from 2009. I thought I remembered something much more recent, >>> like last year or so. >> This perhaps: >> * Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita * >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAOjayEfKBL-_Q9m3Jsv6V-mK1q8h%3Dca5Hm0fecXGxZUhPDN9BA%40mail.gmail.com > Yeah, that's the thread I remembered. I think the basic conclusion was > that we needed a Perl script that would suck up a bunch of data from some > representation that's more edit-friendly than the DATA lines, expand > symbolic representations (regprocedure etc) into numeric OIDs, and write > out the .bki script from that. I thought some people had volunteered to > work on that, but we've seen no results ... > > regards, tom lane > > Would a python script converting something like json or yaml be acceptable? I think right now only perl is used, so it would be a new build chain tool, albeit one that's in my (very humble) opinion much better suited to the task.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: