Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6883.1478706438@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0
in catalog head files?
Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hmm, that's from 2009. I thought I remembered something much more recent, >> like last year or so. > This perhaps: > * Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita * > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAOjayEfKBL-_Q9m3Jsv6V-mK1q8h%3Dca5Hm0fecXGxZUhPDN9BA%40mail.gmail.com Yeah, that's the thread I remembered. I think the basic conclusion was that we needed a Perl script that would suck up a bunch of data from some representation that's more edit-friendly than the DATA lines, expand symbolic representations (regprocedure etc) into numeric OIDs, and write out the .bki script from that. I thought some people had volunteered to work on that, but we've seen no results ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: