Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e376087c-1525-418e-bd78-17b5266fb680@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize() (Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/3/2024 10:10, Tender Wang wrote: > > > Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru > <mailto:a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>> 于2024年3月5日周二 17:36写道: > > On 1/3/2024 14:18, Tender Wang wrote: > > During debug, I learned that numeric_add doesn't have type check > like > > rangetype, so aboved query will not report "type with xxx does > not exist". > > > > And I realize that the test case added by Andrei Lepikhov in v3 is > > right. So in v6 patch I add Andrei Lepikhov's test case. Thanks > a lot. > > > > Now I think the v6 version patch seems to be complete now. > I've passed through the patch, and it looks okay. Although I am afraid > of the same problems that future changes can cause and how to detect > them, it works correctly. > > > Thanks for reviewing it, and I add it to commitfest 2024-07. I think, it is a bug. Should it be fixed (and back-patched) earlier? -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: