Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()
| От | Tender Wang |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHewXNkro3agi6LmaLmQhjqwyi8nzu-sEitnK7EW9z4_e=DLKQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize() (Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 于2024年3月5日周二 17:36写道：
On 1/3/2024 14:18, Tender Wang wrote:
> During debug, I learned that numeric_add doesn't have type check like
> rangetype, so aboved query will not report "type with xxx does not exist".
>
> And I realize that the test case added by Andrei Lepikhov in v3 is
> right. So in v6 patch I add Andrei Lepikhov's test case. Thanks a lot.
>
> Now I think the v6 version patch seems to be complete now.
I've passed through the patch, and it looks okay. Although I am afraid
of the same problems that future changes can cause and how to detect
them, it works correctly.
Thanks for reviewing it, and I add it to commitfest 2024-07.
Tender Wang
OpenPie: https://en.openpie.com/В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: