Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e052d443-d260-49d2-9321-87a940239445@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 4/22/24 13:59, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:21 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com > <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote: > [snip] > > Which gets us back to your comment upstream: > > "What the VACUUM docs "should" do, it seems, is suggest CLUSTER on the > PK, if the PK is a sequence (whether that be an actual sequence, or a > timestamp or something else that grows monotonically)." > > This is a case specific to you and this particular circumstance, not a > general rule for VACUUM FULL. If for no other reason then it might make > more sense for the application that the CLUSTER be done on some other > index then the PK. > > > On Stack Exchange, I've got a question on how to determine when to run > CLUSTER. It ties in strongly with this thread.. > And the link is? -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: