Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANzqJaDnZutXz9-T2_7OMofTHVk6mfnOW_gLJhDdNiUFtbyGMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:03 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 4/22/24 13:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:21 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Which gets us back to your comment upstream:
>
> "What the VACUUM docs "should" do, it seems, is suggest CLUSTER on the
> PK, if the PK is a sequence (whether that be an actual sequence, or a
> timestamp or something else that grows monotonically)."
>
> This is a case specific to you and this particular circumstance, not a
> general rule for VACUUM FULL. If for no other reason then it might make
> more sense for the application that the CLUSTER be done on some other
> index then the PK.
>
>
> On Stack Exchange, I've got a question on how to determine when to run
> CLUSTER. It ties in strongly with this thread..
>
And the link is?
Sorry. Got distracted by the answer.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: