Re: IO scheduler recommendation
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IO scheduler recommendation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | df772cb764b99d4f4a454ee307840022c91bcdb6.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | IO scheduler recommendation ("AB_ba#" <bharti.anup@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: IO scheduler recommendation
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
AB_ba# wrote: > I searched the complete PostgreSQL Documentation but didn't get anything with respect to IO scheduler recommendation. > What is being recommended by PostgreSQL ? There is no clear recommendation. I personally have seen workloads where changing from "cfq" to "deadline" or "noop" improved performance by a factor of 4, but on many systems "cfq" seems to be doing at least as good as the others. I believe that it depends a lot on your hardware configuration and your workload, and you are best advised to run a realistic load test. > Which is the best IO scheduler considering the Data is hosted on NFS? No idea - probably depends on what is behind the NFS. Make sure to use hard, fg mounts. If you can, use "jumbo frames" so that an 8KB block can fit into a single IP frame. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: