Re: IO scheduler recommendation
От | AB_ba# |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IO scheduler recommendation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHMim6qzmodYXJtnOQBU-ge5Q0WHKsPOkFkLMSBLB5YShae0oQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: IO scheduler recommendation (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: IO scheduler recommendation
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Thanks Laurenz
Surprise to know that there are no official recommendation from PostgreSQL.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:14 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
AB_ba# wrote:
> I searched the complete PostgreSQL Documentation but didn't get anything with respect to IO scheduler recommendation.
> What is being recommended by PostgreSQL ?
There is no clear recommendation.
I personally have seen workloads where changing from "cfq" to "deadline"
or "noop" improved performance by a factor of 4, but on many systems "cfq"
seems to be doing at least as good as the others.
I believe that it depends a lot on your hardware configuration and
your workload, and you are best advised to run a realistic load test.
> Which is the best IO scheduler considering the Data is hosted on NFS?
No idea - probably depends on what is behind the NFS.
Make sure to use hard, fg mounts.
If you can, use "jumbo frames" so that an 8KB block can fit into
a single IP frame.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Thanks and Regards
ANUP BHARTI
ANUP BHARTI
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: