Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dde26ecf46ba710a503635bf28914c4c@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!? (Joerg Hessdoerfer <Joerg.Hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message > Wouldn't it be easier (and more portable, see 7.3/7.2 system catalogs vs. > psql) to have views for that? Do I miss a point here? Putting the \d commands into views has been on the TODO list for a long time: I think it is actually the only psql-related item left, until we change the backend protocol to indicate transaction state. I don't think a view would have helped with the psql 7.2/7.3 change: a lot more changed than simply the underlying SQL. Some of the the backslash commands are not amenable to putting inside a view, as they actually compromise multiple SQL calls and some logic in the C code, but a few could probably be made into views. Could whomever added that particular TODO item expand on this? -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200301131137 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+IuuovJuQZxSWSsgRAgQXAKCdu0+CelZ1V2bwI/HoJHIz+a3DPACgix7u pOcRXwHb+4NJLMeSpNaqzRM= =0yFo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: