Re: Inheritance mention
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inheritance mention |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10904130947v39309a9ahab513bad19388dd3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inheritance mention (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inheritance mention
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com> writes: >> Bruce Momjian escreveu: >>> Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1 >>> didn't reference child tables by default? >>> >> No. IMHO we should remove references to unsupported releases from documentation. > > "Unsupported releases" is far too strict a criterion for this. For > example, there are demonstrably still people using 7.2 (we had a > question about it just last week). They will still appreciate these > notes when they get around to updating. > > Pre-7.1 might indeed be old enough to cut, but how much are we really > saving? Four sentences out of our current docs doesn't excite me ... But since there's a doc set per version, it would make sense to stop mentioning unsupported versions in the docs for supported versions, no? Or is this a FAQ thing we're talking about?
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: