Re: Inheritance mention
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inheritance mention |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17838.1239643306@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inheritance mention (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inheritance mention
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Pre-7.1 might indeed be old enough to cut, but how much are we really >> saving? �Four sentences out of our current docs doesn't excite me ... > But since there's a doc set per version, it would make sense to stop > mentioning unsupported versions in the docs for supported versions, > no? Or is this a FAQ thing we're talking about? The problem is what to tell people to read if they want to transition from an unsupported version to a supported version. If we really wanted to save some space, we could cut all the release notes for pre-7.4 (soon pre-8.0) releases. But somehow that doesn't seem like a good idea. What it would mainly accomplish is to make it hard to find the old information when you wanted it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: