Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10805161007h5fd1c700ieb185a7979681e49@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: >> >> Matthew Wakeling <matthew 'at' flymine.org> writes: > >> It is still relevant, as with 5% margin, you can afford changing >> that to 0% with tune2fs, just the time for you to start PG and >> remove some data by SQL, then shutdown and set the margin to 5% >> again. >> > > I find that if you actually reach that level of capacity failure it is due > to lack of management and likely there is much lower hanging fruit left over > by a lazy dba or sysadmin than having to adjust filesystem level parameters. > > Manage actively and the above change is absolutely irrelevant. Sorry, but that's like saying that open heart surgery isn't a fix for clogged arteries because you should have been taking aspirin everyday and exercising. It might not be the best answer, but sometimes it's the only answer you've got. I know that being able to drop the margin from x% to 0% for 10 minutes has pulled more than one db back from the brink for me (usually consulting on other people's databases, only once or so on my own) :)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: