Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 482C58EA.5090904@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql (Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>) |
| Ответы |
Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql
Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Matthew Wakeling <matthew 'at' flymine.org> writes: > It is still relevant, as with 5% margin, you can afford changing > that to 0% with tune2fs, just the time for you to start PG and > remove some data by SQL, then shutdown and set the margin to 5% > again. > I find that if you actually reach that level of capacity failure it is due to lack of management and likely there is much lower hanging fruit left over by a lazy dba or sysadmin than having to adjust filesystem level parameters. Manage actively and the above change is absolutely irrelevant. Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: