Re: pg_dump order of operation
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump order of operation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d800369b-1896-607a-819f-6896df12fdee@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump order of operation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump order of operation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/26/2018 01:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes: >> On 08/26/2018 10:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes: >>>> In what order does the 9.6 pg_dump dump tables? >>> I don't believe the ordering rules have changed materially since 8.4; >>> it's intended to be by object kind, and within that by name, except >>> where dependencies force doing something else. >> I thought that didn't matter, since FK and PK constraints were added (in the >> required order) after all data was loaded). >>> But what are you thinking constitutes the "dump order" in a parallel dump? >> I don't understand your question. > Perhaps I don't understand *your* question. What concrete problem are you > having? I want to track the progress of pg_dump so as to estimate completion time. -- Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: