Re: pg_dump order of operation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump order of operation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15595.1535312646@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump order of operation (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump order of operation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes: > On 08/26/2018 01:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Perhaps I don't understand *your* question. What concrete problem are you >> having? > I want to track the progress of pg_dump so as to estimate completion time. Well, if you don't use --jobs then you should get more or less the same behavior as in 8.4. If you do use that, then it's hardly surprising that things are more complicated. It looks like there's a hack in there to order tables by decreasing size during a parallel dump, on the theory that we'll get more parallelism that way. (Not sure I believe that, and the part of it that also orders index dumps that way is certainly brain-dead.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: