Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d70c8ee9-aa1b-0141-58e1-5ff359241f29@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.06.21 04:51, Noah Misch wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: >> test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms >> test deadlock-hard ... ok 10624 ms >> test deadlock-soft ... ok 147 ms >> test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms >> test deadlock-parallel ... ok 132 ms >> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok 553 ms >> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok 234 ms >> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok 2389 ms >> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok 1876 ms >> Make the test output visually consistent, as previously done by commit >> 14378245. > Not bad, but I would instead shorten the names to detach-[1234] or > detach-partition-[1234]. The marginal value of the second word is low, and > the third word helps even less. DETACH CONCURRENTLY is a separate feature from plain DETACH. But "partition" is surely redundant here.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: