Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210609025129.GC475088@rfd.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms > test deadlock-hard ... ok 10624 ms > test deadlock-soft ... ok 147 ms > test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms > test deadlock-parallel ... ok 132 ms > test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok 553 ms > test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok 234 ms > test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok 2389 ms > test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok 1876 ms > Make the test output visually consistent, as previously done by commit > 14378245. Not bad, but I would instead shorten the names to detach-[1234] or detach-partition-[1234]. The marginal value of the second word is low, and the third word helps even less. > - status(_("test %-28s ... "), tests[0]); > + status(_("test %-32s ... "), tests[0]); As the whitespace gulf widens, it gets harder to match left and right sides visually. We'd cope of course, but wider spacing isn't quite free.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: