Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*?
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d1gcel$i53$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*? (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*?
Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Here's my question about "multi-master" replication whether it's Oracle or not. How in the world does it work over high latency, low bandwidth connections w/o getting pummelled in performance? I mean it's fine when you have whole bunch of servers in the same building. But I've got servers across the country and waiting for 2-phase commit across a 100ms+ connection just sounds ugly like hell. I've tried some simple tests -- a client running some simple transactions across a VPN from San Francisco/CA to Sterling/VA and it's 10000 times slower than on a local 100mbit LAN. Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:47:24AM -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > >>Oracle and DB2 also offer an ability to parallelize queries across >>nodes, so that you can query extremely large (multi-TB) data sets quickly. >> >>They also all market multimaster replication. > > > "Market" is the operative word in the IBM case, note. It's a fine > product, no question, but I've never been able to see any significant > way in which it's really multimaster. And you can actually do the > same sort of thing using the right combination of hardware and > PostgreSQL. In fact, my colleagues and I (ok, mostly my colleagues > -- I'm relegated to moving the furniture about) doing it right now. > > ORAC is in another league entirely. I hope we can do something about > that soon, too. > > A >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: