Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*?
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 423BBB54.10500@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*? (William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What do Oracle, DB2, etc. actually *do*?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
William Yu wrote: > Here's my question about "multi-master" replication whether it's Oracle > or not. How in the world does it work over high latency, low bandwidth > connections w/o getting pummelled in performance? Well, it may well be the case that it doesn't work :) Not all kinds of replication are appropriate for all situations, and I agree that synchronous, multi-master replication isn't likely to be useful in the situation you describe. One solution to multi-master replication on slow networks (or networks with nodes that are only intermittently connected) is to be very asynchronous: transaction commit only affects the local node, and conflict resolution is done when replicating changes later. This is more useful for filesystem replication: it is easier to do after-the-fact conflict resolution, although it is still very complex. ISTM it should be possible with DBMS replication, at least in theory. -Neil
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: