Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

On 25/09/17 20:18, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:
>>      However, if DMS uses it for what I'd call production use, I assume it is
>> actually production quality. I bet they do enough testing, and don't ship
>> software to potentially millions of customers if it doesn't work well. So...
>> first, I'd consider this a a sign of robustness.
> You've been in software for how long? ... ;)  There's quite mixed
> experiences with DMS.
    Actually long enough to understand that if someone "big" calls it 
production quality, we should not be pickier and assume it is --whether 
it is or not. People will accept it as such, and that's good enough.

;)


>
> FWIW, I don't think there's a huge problem w/ using test_decoding - the
> output isn't pretty but it's parseable. It's too verbose due to
> repeating column & type names (which also slows down), but...
    Everything is parseable. I don't have a big problem with that. 
Stability is another issue: as long as it supports high volume 
operations and doesn't break, it's acceptable enough.

    Álvaro


-- 

Alvaro Hernandez


-----------
OnGres



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers