Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEy3e_ncM+f3=i6T1qvwHkH1c3f2MmJd1ZS=Aq+OfBKS5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output (Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com> wrote:
On 25/09/17 20:18, Andres Freund wrote:On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:However, if DMS uses it for what I'd call production use, I assume it isYou've been in software for how long? ... ;) There's quite mixed
actually production quality. I bet they do enough testing, and don't ship
software to potentially millions of customers if it doesn't work well. So...
first, I'd consider this a a sign of robustness.
experiences with DMS.
Actually long enough to understand that if someone "big" calls it production quality, we should not be pickier and assume it is --whether it is or not. People will accept it as such, and that's good enough.
Historically the fact that we have been pickier than many of the "someone big":s is exactly how we ended up with the codebase and relative stability we have today.
Just because someone is big doesn't mean they know what's right. In fact, more often than not the opposite turns out to be true.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: