Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case
От | Martin Atukunda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ce92d7150608250803x7861d577ob50a40ff5625ab46@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On 8/21/06, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > > > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 19:27 +0300, Martin Atukunda wrote: > > >> If readline is used by psql, a history file is automatically used. > > >> This patch adds the special file name 'none', which if set as the > > >> HISTFILE parameter, will cause psql not to use the history file. > > > > > I think it would be cleaner to use a separate \set variable to control > > > whether a history file is written, rather than needlessly overloading > > > the meaning of HISTFILE. > > > > Why is this useful at all? There's already the -n (don't use readline) > > switch. > > Seems he wants readline without history, perhaps for security. Doesn't > setting HISTFILE to /dev/null work? > hmm, setting HISTFILE to /dev/null doesn't work on my MacOSX here. so I whipped up this patch. - Martin -
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: