Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200608211653.k7LGrAw27676@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 19:27 +0300, Martin Atukunda wrote: > >> If readline is used by psql, a history file is automatically used. > >> This patch adds the special file name 'none', which if set as the > >> HISTFILE parameter, will cause psql not to use the history file. > > > I think it would be cleaner to use a separate \set variable to control > > whether a history file is written, rather than needlessly overloading > > the meaning of HISTFILE. > > Why is this useful at all? There's already the -n (don't use readline) > switch. Seems he wants readline without history, perhaps for security. Doesn't setting HISTFILE to /dev/null work? -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: