Re: Postgres perl module namespace
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ce3dc94c-2826-e2b3-42f7-dd0cecf9526c@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres perl module namespace (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres perl module namespace
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/25/21 10:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 3:03 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >>>> OK, I count 3 in favor of changing to PgTest::Cluster, 1 against, >>>> remainder don't care. >>> I'd have gone with something starting with Postgres:: ... but I don't care much. >> PgTest seems like a better choice to me, as "Postgres" could be used >> for other purposes than a testing framework, and the argument that >> multiple paths makes things annoying for hackers is sensible. > I mean, it's a hierarchical namespace. The idea is you do > Postgres::Test or Postgres::<whatever> and other people using the > Postgres database can use other parts of it. But again, not really > worth arguing about. > I think I have come around to this POV. Here's a patch. The worst of it is changes like this: - my $node2 = PostgresNode->new('replica'); + my $node2 = Postgres::Test::Cluster->new('replica'); ... - TestLib::system_or_bail($tar, 'xf', $tblspc_tars[0], '-C', $repTsDir); + Postgres::Test::Utils::system_or_bail($tar, 'xf', $tblspc_tars[0], '-C', $repTsDir); and I think that's not so bad. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: