Re: Postgres perl module namespace
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoazCbbtxGEUaFFkArYxq_8r1iwL4kNG+fzJTzcDPRVfBw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres perl module namespace (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres perl module namespace
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 3:03 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > >> OK, I count 3 in favor of changing to PgTest::Cluster, 1 against, > >> remainder don't care. > > > > I'd have gone with something starting with Postgres:: ... but I don't care much. > > PgTest seems like a better choice to me, as "Postgres" could be used > for other purposes than a testing framework, and the argument that > multiple paths makes things annoying for hackers is sensible. I mean, it's a hierarchical namespace. The idea is you do Postgres::Test or Postgres::<whatever> and other people using the Postgres database can use other parts of it. But again, not really worth arguing about. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: