Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
От | Adrian Maier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cd30ef8c0606231143x23760157l443a72d785677cab@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23/06/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > > >> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm - > >> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results. > > > > Yeah, and this is not a good thing. Eventually I'd like to get to a > > point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm > > reports. No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta > > work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build. > > > > Then people who have access to people who own or can provide access to > machines in classes not covered need to do a bit of begging ;-) > > The requirements are (deliberately) very modest: > > Once it is set up it is close to hands free - you just set up the cron > job(s) or equivalent. Hello, I'll try to set up a buildfarm installation for Cygwin on my computer at work. But I'm taking the next week off, so this will have to wait until my return. Cheers, Adrian Maier
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: