Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 449C332D.7010503@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm - >> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results. >> > > Yeah, and this is not a good thing. Eventually I'd like to get to a > point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm > reports. No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta > work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build. > > > Then people who have access to people who own or can provide access to machines in classes not covered need to do a bit of begging ;-) The requirements are (deliberately) very modest: OS and toolset required to build postgres from CVS A modern perl installation (>=5.6 is adequate) Anonymous read access to a CVS repository - either the one at postgresql.org or a replica Outbound HTTP port 80 access to www.pgbuildfarm.org, possibly via a proxy. Once it is set up it is close to hands free - you just set up the cron job(s) or equivalent. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: