Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
| От | Tomas Vondra |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c0c253a0-4825-f295-1583-50f9bbab7d5f@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc? (David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, there's minor bitrot in the Mkvcbuild.pm change, making cfbot unhappy. As for the patch, I don't have much comments. I'm wondering if it'd be useful to indicate which timing source was actually used for EXPLAIN ANALYZE, say something like: Planning time: 0.197 ms Execution time: 0.225 ms Timing source: clock_gettime (or tsc) There has been a proposal to expose this as a GUC (or perhaps as explain option), to allow users to pick what timing source to use. I wouldn't go that far - AFAICS is this is meant to be universally better when available. But knowing which source was used seems useful. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: