Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBTZ+TrWpigGERq_7ANom1prCucO6qg3jxXssaLMAh2BA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc? (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
po 16. 1. 2023 v 21:34 odesílatel Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> napsal:
Hi,
there's minor bitrot in the Mkvcbuild.pm change, making cfbot unhappy.
As for the patch, I don't have much comments. I'm wondering if it'd be
useful to indicate which timing source was actually used for EXPLAIN
ANALYZE, say something like:
Planning time: 0.197 ms
Execution time: 0.225 ms
Timing source: clock_gettime (or tsc)
There has been a proposal to expose this as a GUC (or perhaps as explain
option), to allow users to pick what timing source to use. I wouldn't go
that far - AFAICS is this is meant to be universally better when
available. But knowing which source was used seems useful.
+1
Pavel
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: