Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b5074db1-9b98-4d5d-c82d-1e5807120543@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/7/17 14:53, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 9/5/17 15:32, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I do agree with the idea that we should use the * notation in cases where >>> the reader might otherwise think that a plain function was being invoked, >>> ie I don't like >>> some_function_pointer(args); >>> Even if the compiler isn't confused, readers might be. But in the case of >>> structname->pointerfield(args); >>> it's impossible to read that as a plain function call, so I'm okay with >>> dropping the extra punctuation there. > >> Committed that way. Thanks. > > Is it worth memorializing this in the docs somewhere, perhaps > "53.4. Miscellaneous Coding Conventions" ? done -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: