Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4152.1504810380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 9/5/17 15:32, Tom Lane wrote: >> I do agree with the idea that we should use the * notation in cases where >> the reader might otherwise think that a plain function was being invoked, >> ie I don't like >> some_function_pointer(args); >> Even if the compiler isn't confused, readers might be. But in the case of >> structname->pointerfield(args); >> it's impossible to read that as a plain function call, so I'm okay with >> dropping the extra punctuation there. > Committed that way. Thanks. Is it worth memorializing this in the docs somewhere, perhaps "53.4. Miscellaneous Coding Conventions" ? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: