Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b4b3105f-39cc-df2b-55ac-4dcfa8c303da@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 (Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/07/14 9:08, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: >> I've attached the latest version patches. I've incorporated the review >> comments I got so far and improved locking strategy. > > Thanks for updating the patch! +1 I'm interested in these patches and now studying them. While checking the behaviors of the patched PostgreSQL, I got three comments. 1. We can access to the foreign table even during recovery in the HEAD. But in the patched version, when I did that, I got the following error. Is this intentional? ERROR: cannot assign TransactionIds during recovery 2. With the patch, when INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE are executed both in local and remote servers, 2PC is executed at the commit phase. But when write SQL (e.g., TRUNCATE) except INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE are executed in local and INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE are executed in remote, 2PC is NOT executed. Is this safe? 3. XACT_FLAGS_WROTENONTEMPREL is set when INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE are executed. But it's not reset even when those queries are canceled by ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT. This may cause unnecessary 2PC at the commit phase. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: