Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
От | Masahiro Ikeda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a9df543bfb45b2f06834be6babb3b79f@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I've attached the latest version patches. I've incorporated the review > comments I got so far and improved locking strategy. Thanks for updating the patch! I have three questions about the v23 patches. 1. messages related to user canceling In my understanding, there are two messages which can be output when a user cancels the COMMIT command. A. When prepare is failed, the output shows that committed locally but some error is occurred. ``` postgres=*# COMMIT; ^CCancel request sent WARNING: canceling wait for resolving foreign transaction due to user request DETAIL: The transaction has already committed locally, but might not have been committed on the foreign server. ERROR: server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. CONTEXT: remote SQL command: PREPARE TRANSACTION 'fx_1020791818_519_16399_10' ``` B. When prepare is succeeded, the output show that committed locally. ``` postgres=*# COMMIT; ^CCancel request sent WARNING: canceling wait for resolving foreign transaction due to user request DETAIL: The transaction has already committed locally, but might not have been committed on the foreign server. COMMIT ``` In case of A, I think that "committed locally" message can confuse user. Because although messages show committed but the transaction is "ABORTED". I think "committed" message means that "ABORT" is committed locally. But is there a possibility of misunderstanding? In case of A, it's better to change message for user friendly, isn't it? 2. typo Is trasnactions in fdwxact.c typo? 3. FdwXactGetWaiter in fdwxact.c return unused value FdwXactGetWaiter is called in FXRslvLoop function. It returns *waitXid_p, but FXRslvloop doesn't seem to use *waitXid_p. Do we need to return it? Regards, -- Masahiro Ikeda NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: