Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150903300801r3c3dc765k32f7f6a6164bac23@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>> I personally would be happy with the two-argument function solution. >>> >> >> I modified my previous patch to use a two-argument function solution. > > This looks OK to me, except I think we should modify the documentation > to PQinitSSL() to say that it you must not use both that function and > PQinitSecure(), and explain that if you need to control initialization > of libcrypto and libssl, you should use that function instead. do you think PQinitSSL should be deprecated? merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: