Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10380.1238425522@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> This looks OK to me, except I think we should modify the documentation >> to PQinitSSL() to say that it you must not use both that function and >> PQinitSecure(), and explain that if you need to control initialization >> of libcrypto and libssl, you should use that function instead. > do you think PQinitSSL should be deprecated? I see no reason to deprecate it per se. I was planning to just define it as equivalent to PQinitSecure(do_init, do_init). BTW, unless someone objects I'd like to make the name of that function PQinitSecurity. The other looks like it's implying that it is replacing an insecure PQinit() function ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: