Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150611061309u4315118r47632abd0e2acebc@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? (Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 11/6/06, Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com> wrote: > I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read > performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal > (~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it. Unfortunately, > they're using the fact that bonnie++ is an open source benchmark to > weasle out of doing anything- they can't fix it unless I can show an > impact in Postgresql. > > So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy > benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the > problem? I have a second database running on a single SATA drive, so I > can use that as a comparison point- "look, we're getting 1/3rd the read > speed of a single SATA drive- this sucks!" hitachi? my experience with storage vendors is when they say things like that they know full well their device completely sucks and are just stalling so that you give up. merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: