Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 454F9F62.9070408@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Setting "nice" values (Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal (~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it. Unfortunately, they're using the fact that bonnie++ is an open source benchmark to weasle out of doing anything- they can't fix it unless I can show an impact in Postgresql. So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the problem? I have a second database running on a single SATA drive, so I can use that as a comparison point- "look, we're getting 1/3rd the read speed of a single SATA drive- this sucks!" Any advice? Brian
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: