Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b19a8e2b-e000-f592-3e0b-3e90ba0fa816@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitionsfail
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2017/08/01 10:10, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp >> wrote: > >> >> On a second thought though, I think we should list the foreign table >> partitions' limitations in only one place, that is, the CREATE FOREIGN >> TABLE reference page. Listing them under 5.10.2.3. seems a bit off to me, >> because other limitations listed there are those of the new partitioned >> table objects, such as lack of global index constraints, etc. Lack of >> tuple-routing to foreign partitions does not seem to me of the similar >> nature. Also, the same text is no longer repeated in 3 different places. >> >> Thoughts on the updated patch? >> > > Overall, works for me. > > grammar (add a couple of commas for flow) and style (dropping the first > "the") > > current: "(both the user-defined constraints such as <literal>CHECK</> or > <literal>NOT NULL</> clauses and the partition constraint)" > proposed: "(both user-defined constraints, such as <literal>CHECK</> or > <literal>NOT NULL</> clauses, and the partition constraint)" Good points; fixed in the updated patch. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: