Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwZNxLfpsUPMs82m+t-Z3Oa45jVREjLqima5GOx3DK7NrQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On a second thought though, I think we should list the foreign table
partitions' limitations in only one place, that is, the CREATE FOREIGN
TABLE reference page. Listing them under 5.10.2.3. seems a bit off to me,
because other limitations listed there are those of the new partitioned
table objects, such as lack of global index constraints, etc. Lack of
tuple-routing to foreign partitions does not seem to me of the similar
nature. Also, the same text is no longer repeated in 3 different places.
Thoughts on the updated patch?
Overall, works for me.
grammar (add a couple of commas for flow) and style (dropping the first "the")
current: "(both the user-defined constraints such as <literal>CHECK</> or <literal>NOT NULL</> clauses and the partition constraint)"
proposed: "(both user-defined constraints, such as <literal>CHECK</> or <literal>NOT NULL</> clauses, and the partition constraint)"
Thanks!
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: