Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ae85fa30-5aea-ef56-6506-b8af2d3507ba@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote: >> External links already create footnotes in the PDF output. Is that >> different from what you are saying? > That might, only, indicate that I was just thinking aloud in email and > had not gone and checked in PDF output to see how the links were handled. > > Yes, it could very possibly indicate that. > > If they are already processed that way, does that mean the > > o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output > > in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and > doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without > hesitation? I think it's obsolete, yes. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: