Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8c02f9b5-965e-ce51-2b20-e70c0d46a6a0@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-01-26 09:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote: >>> External links already create footnotes in the PDF output. Is that >>> different from what you are saying? >> That might, only, indicate that I was just thinking aloud in email and >> had not gone and checked in PDF output to see how the links were handled. >> >> Yes, it could very possibly indicate that. >> >> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the >> >> o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output >> >> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and >> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without >> hesitation? > > I think it's obsolete, yes. Committed that change. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: