Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aac311f8b41582e08ccb127d3a553e0d@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-08 15:56, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-04-08 09:51:39 -0400, David Steele wrote: >> On 3/2/17 7:54 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> > >> > Yes the copy patch needs rebase as well. But these ones are fine. >> >> This bug has been moved to CF 2017-07. > > FWIW, as these are bug-fixes that need to be backpatched, I do plan to > work on them soon. > CF 2017-07 pertains to postgres 11, is that right? But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before the postgres 10 release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very broken without them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know which ones are essential and which may not be). If it's at all useful I can repeat tests to show how often current master still fails (easily 50% or so failure-rate). This would be the pgbench-over-logical-replication test that I did so often earlier on. thanks, Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: