Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170408143059.nrzuwyvv5apnhhta@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-08 16:29:10 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote: > On 2017-04-08 15:56, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2017-04-08 09:51:39 -0400, David Steele wrote: > > > On 3/2/17 7:54 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes the copy patch needs rebase as well. But these ones are fine. > > > > > > This bug has been moved to CF 2017-07. > > > > FWIW, as these are bug-fixes that need to be backpatched, I do plan to > > work on them soon. > > > > CF 2017-07 pertains to postgres 11, is that right? > > But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before the postgres 10 > release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very broken without > them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know which ones > are essential and which may not be). Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't plan to wait for 2017-07. - Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: