On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 08:28:45PM -0500, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that
>> INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with.
>
> I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are
> storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as
> well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct.
+1
--
nathan