On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <
jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that
INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with.
I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct.
David J.